Bad medieval book manners. Part 2

Here is the second and last part of an article about the care of books in the Middle Ages that I have recently begun writing. Part one can be found here. If you’d rather not read the first part, then you can still enjoy, I hope, the rest of this article. We are following Richard de Bury, a 14th-century bibliophile through his denunciation of those who mishandle and misuse books. What follows is from chapter 17 of his work Philobiblon, On the Love of Books.

Again, there is a class of thieves shamefully mutilating books, who cut away the margins from the sides to use as material for letters, leaving only the text, or employ the leaves from the ends, inserted for the protection of the book, for various abuses– a kind of sacrilege which should be prohibited by the threat of anathema.

E.C. Thomas’s translation which I followed up to here has ‘various uses and abuses’ but doesn’t do justice to the Latin original, which simply says ‘ad varios abusus’ (for various abuses), so there is no question of legitimate uses of such mutilating practices. I agree. 

img_2158

Limb from limb. These manuscript fragments from about 1300 AD were used to reinforce the spine of other books. They look rather like door hinges, I think. Source here

With the advent of print, many manuscript leaves ended up as spine fortifiers and pastedowns for early printed books, such as this one:

cicero_spine

The Middle Ages being used to reinforce the Renaissance, as it were. Chapel Hill, PA6299.M3.1557 (printed in 1557). Source here

The British Library has a fascinating piece about manuscript fragments here. For more imaginative uses of these fragments, see Erik Kwakkel’s fantasia here.

Richard may not have been able to secure an excommunication (anathema) for book thieves, but he certainly could pronounce a curse on anyone who presumed to abstract a book from the library. Though we know book curses were quite common in this period, it is not clear how thief-repellant they were. To judge by their prevalence, I’d personally say – not much. 

For example, the book curse in the image below has been ‘affixed’ to a 12th-century German Bible. It says: ‘If anyone take away this book of [the Premonstratensian abbey of] St Mary and St Nicholas, Arnstein, let him die the death; let him be fried in a pan; let the falling sickness and fever seize him; let him be broken on the wheel, and hanged. Amen. Not much has been left out. 

Screen Shot 2016-03-03 at 10.11.07

The curse is the text in brown ink. London, BL, Harley MS 2798, fol. 235v

Again, it is part of the decency of scholars that whenever they return from meals to their study, washing should invariably precede reading, and that no grease-stained finger should unfasten the clasps, or turn the leaves of a book.

monk_sneaking_a_drink1

Hopefully those are not the keys to the scriptorium or library. As for drinking, a clear no-no, then…

d58cef6fdc2990c1a95c5e3ec1af37a9

… as now.

Nor let a crying child admire the pictures in the capital letters, lest he soil the parchment with wet fingers; for a child instantly touches whatever he sees. 

There is evidence that at York Minster c.1375–1400 boys, while learning the psalms, misused the choir Psalters and made them dirty.

Moreover, the laity, who look at a book turned upside down just as if it were open in the right way, are utterly unworthy of any communion with books.  Let the clerk take care also that the smutty scullion reeking from his stewpots does not touch the lily leaves of books, all unwashed, but he who walketh without blemish shall minister to the precious volumes. And, again, the cleanliness of decent hands would be of great benefit to books as well as scholars, if it were not that the itch and pimples are characteristic of the clergy.

word-image-2

This leaf used to be lily-white. Now it’s grungy-cream, like a wedding dress after a full day about town. Back to the Dirt Ages here.

Whenever defects are noticed in books, they should be promptly repaired, since nothing spreads more quickly than a tear and a rent which is neglected at the time will have to be repaired afterwards with usury.

book-53

These monks had too much time on their hands and too few women in their midst. Engelberg, Stiftsbibliothek, MS 16, 12th century. Source here

 

Moses, the gentlest of men, teaches us to make bookcases most neatly, wherein they may be protected from any injury: Take, he says, this book of the law, and put it in the side of the ark of the covenant of the Lord your God. O fitting place and appropriate for a library, which was made of imperishable shittim-wood, and was all covered within and without with gold!

anfleam2l0mh8yikqejw

Anti-theft devices avant la lettre: the chained library of Hereford Cathedral.

But the Saviour also has warned us by His example against all unbecoming carelessness in the handling of books, as we read in S. Luke.  For when He had read the scriptural prophecy of Himself in the book that was delivered to Him, He did not give it again to the minister, until He had closed it with his own most sacred hands.  By which students are most clearly taught that in the care of books the merest trifles ought not to be neglected.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Bad medieval book manners. Part 2

  1. Pingback: Bad medieval book manners. Part 1 | philobiblonia

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s